Voting but not driving: what part of progress for Saudi women?
Revision for “Voting but not driving: what part of progress for Saudi women?” created on November 17, 2015 @ 13:22:03 [Autosave]
Voting but not driving: what part of progress for Saudi women?
|
What part of progress? This article is the fifth in a series of articles related to <a href="http://wikiprogress.org/index.php/Main_Page">Wikiprogress</a>.
Wikigender’s [Special_Focus|Community Portal] has recently focused on the announcement, by Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah, of women’s right to vote in the third municipal elections due in 2015. <a href="http://www.wikiprogress.org/index.php/Civic_Engagement">Civic engagement </a>is definitely an important component when measuring the well-being of a society, and the decision was positively welcomed by the media, especially in a country where women’s involvement in public life is very limited. However, some saw it as a small improvement and others as a significant step in women’s empowerment in Saudi Arabia. Why? It depends which “<a href="http://www.wikiprogress.org/index.php/Progress">progress</a> lens” we use to interpret the decision… One striking example of <a href="http://www.wikiprogress.org/index.php/Inequality">inequality</a> between women and men in Saudi Arabia is that women are not allowed to drive. Although there is no legislation banning women from driving, the ban comes from senior clerics who claim that the ban protects against temptation, as women drivers would have more opportunities to leave home alone and meet male strangers. This means women have to rely on taxi drivers, privately hired drivers or male drivers from the family. King Abdullah is not able to lift the ban, as he depends on the clerics to support his ruling family.Al Jazeera and agencies, <a href="http://english.aljazeera.net/video/middleeast/2011/06/20116178101478564.html">Saudi women launch bid to defy driving ban</a>, 17 June 2011 So clearly, the <a href="http://www.wikiprogress.org/index.php/Human_Rights">human rights</a> dimension of progress is missing here. This is one progress lens. For Saudi women it is a difficult situation, especially when so much change has happened in neighbouring countries following the <a href="http://www.wikiprogress.org/index.php/Arab_Spring">Arab Spring</a>. Surely these two examples indicate some progress – but to a different degree. What part of progress do we need to look at? The broader picture? Or the smaller steps? Current progress? Or future progress? Every progress counts, but… Having the right to vote does not necessarily mean that women will vote, be it for security reasons, or because of Saudi Arabia’s guardianship system: indeed, if a male guardian decides that his wife, daughter or sister should not vote, she will still not be able to. This brings us back to the human rights dimension of progress that we mentioned before. The same applied in Afghanistan, where security issues significantly limited the female turnout in the 2009 presidential election. In particular, “in one area with an estimated population of between 35,000 and 50,000, the district governor said no women had voted at all”. Small steps of progress can lead to more significant progress if change happens. But for Saudi Arabia the equation does not seem so straightforward, as the country tries to seek modernity without changing its religious heritage.Lubna Hussain, <a href="http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/10/05/8168677-vote-or-drive-saudi-women-would-rather-be-behind-the-wheel">Vote or drive? Saudi women would rather be behind the wheel</a>, NBC News, 5 October 2011 This means that real progress for women is very difficult to achieve, as <a href="http://www.wikigender.org/index.php/Social_Institutions_and_Gender_Index#What_are_social_institutions.3F">traditions discriminating against women</a> prevail: the roots of the problem impeding progress are still there. So yes, allowing women to vote in Saudi Arabia is progress. But it is only one part of progress. |