Sustainable development? Not without family planning!
Revision for “Sustainable development? Not without family planning!” created on November 16, 2015 @ 14:23:39 [Autosave]
Sustainable development? Not without family planning!
|
This article is the 10th in a series of articles related to <a href="http://wikiprogress.org/">Wikiprogress</a>.
<i>“The lack of recognition of reproductive rights as essential to sustainable development was especially disappointing.”</i> Women’s groups had very high expectations of the "United, which was a major opportunity to focus on women’s contributions to a more equitable and sustainable world through maintaining the livelihoods and welfare of their families and communities. Women represent half of the population, yet they continue to face many discriminations, despite the fact that their role as key agents of change is increasingly being acknowledged. Empowering half the population is therefore crucial to ensure environmental sustainability. Not only in giving women equal access to land, resources, technology and training, but even more importantly in giving them access to voluntary <a href="http://wikiprogress.org/index.php/Family_planning">family planning</a>. However, the Rio+20 outcome document mentioned women less than 0.01 percent, and only two of the 283 sections addressed women’s needs for family planning.Grist.org, Why women’s needs must be part of the conversation at Rio, 2 July 2012, available at: http://grist.org/population/why-womens-needs-must-be-part-of-the-conversation-at-rio/ Although this was a major disappointment for women activists, the emphasis on reproductive rights and family planning has already started to spill out following Rio+20 and is likely to continue, until change happens. Already following the UK Summit, the Female Health Company announced a their commitment to: <b>Where’s the Controversy in Saving Lives?</b> <b>Family Planning: A Unique Opportunity for Change </b>
|