Achieving societal progress through increasing women’s employment opportunities
Revision for “Achieving societal progress through increasing women’s employment opportunities” created on January 27, 2016 @ 15:38:20 [Autosave]
Achieving societal progress through increasing women’s employment opportunities
|
This article is the sixth in a series of articles related to <a href="http://wikiprogress.org/index.php/Main_Page">Wikiprogress</a>.
This article largely draws on a special report on "Women and work" published in the 26 November 2011 edition of <i>The Economist</i> and on a recently published report by the OECD Development Centre: <b><a href="http://www.wikiprogress.org/index.php/Social_Cohesion#21_November_2011:_Launch_of_the_Perspectives_on_Global_Development_2012:_Social_Cohesion_in_a_Shifting_World">"Perspectives on Global Development 2012: Social Cohesion in a Shifting World"</a></b> (PGD). It focuses on women’s relationship with employment and looks at how, by including women better in the labour market, they are also better included in society in general and therefore they are better able to participate to the creation of <a href="http://www.wikiprogress.org/index.php/Social_Cohesion">cohesive societies</a>. Women are also increasingly being given more attention to: in Europe, some countries have imposed quotas to get more women on company boards, and organisations such as the "United, the "Organisation or the "World are pushing gender equality forward.<ref name="closing"></ref> Indeed, why wouldn’t half of the talent pool be included? Not only women’s presence has been positively correlated, in several studies, with a company’s performance and higher profits<ref name="closing"></ref> – but having women in teams of leaders also add diversity of experiences, which is likely to lead to more new and original ideas.<ref name="suits"></ref> Another reason is that as populations are ageing, including more women in the labour force is essential to tackle the decline of the workforce.<ref name="closing"></ref> And finally, isn’t progress all about inclusiveness and equal opportunities for everyone – including women? There are <a href="http://www.wikiprogress.org/index.php/Social_Cohesion#What_is_Social_Cohesion.3F_Some_Definitions">many definitions of social cohesion</a>. The definition used in the 2012 Perspectives on Global Development states: <i>“a society is “cohesive” if it works towards the well-being of all its members, fights exclusion and marginalisation, creates a sense of belonging, promotes trust, and offers its members the opportunity of upward social mobility.”</i><ref name="Chapter 2">2012 Perspectives on Global Development, Chapter 2, p. 53</ref> This entails addressing inequalities that are motivated by group identity (including those between different ethnic groups and between men and women). Further, “increased female labour force participation on an equal footing with men is unequivocally one of the most positive ways to reduce income inequality”.<ref name="Part 2">2012 Perspectives on Global Development, Part 2, p. 127</ref> <b>In the PGD 2012</b>, it is suggested to include women in all spheres of public life, both in political and economic participation. Quotas as well as a deeper change in "Social Institutions and Gender Index#What are social institutions.3F, attitudes and norms are suggested measures.<ref name="Part 2"></ref> Further, it is argued that governments should give adequate space to citizens to exercise their voice in order to provide the necessary conditions to foster social cohesion, and this includes an emphasis on minorities and women.<ref>2012 Perspectives on Global Development, Chapter 7, p. 203</ref> Other solutions proposed within the context of discriminatory social institutions include: |