This online discussion aims to facilitate inclusive exchange of opinion and information on the state of land rights of women in India, the legal, institutional framework and socio-cultural factors affecting women’s equitable land tenure rights, good practices/innovations around women’s land tenure rights by Government/NGO and challenges and opportunities towards realization of gender equitable land tenure by 2030. It will analyze the status of data availability and accessibility around women land rights in India with available information from different sources along with an assessment of such sources by the participants with an aim to see if a suggestive framework for open data can be developed and made accessible to help SDG monitoring.

Secure and equitable land rights of women form some of the key indicators of the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including 5.a.1 on the proportion of total agricultural population with ownership or secure rights over agricultural land. This indicators is considered to have a potentially transformational role in the achievement of four of the 17 SDGs, including ending poverty (Goal 1), ensuring food security (Goal 2), achieving gender equality and empowering women (Goal 5), and making cities and human settlements inclusive (Goal 11). Gender equality is one of the ten core principles for implementation listed in FAO’s Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (VGGT) of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (the “Guidelines”; FAO, 2012).

Secure land rights of women have demonstrated enhanced agricultural productivity and building resilience among the small and marginal farmers, who constitute 75 percent of the farming community.

The Constitution of India provides equal rights to both men and women. Women’s access to land is largely through inheritance and inheritance is governed by customs, which varies across regions and States. There are various property rights regimes prevailing and the succession Acts of various religious laws, which determines women right to property and inheritance. Hindu Succession Act (Amendment), 2005, which applies to a majority of the country’s area and population, has expanded the space for enhanced women’s land rights. The fifth and sixth Scheduled areas have different customary tribal laws on women property rights and inheritance, which also varies, with specific indigenous community laws.

Over the last few years, both central and state governments have made many progressive reforms to realize the goal of secure and equitable land tenure for all. Among them, the 2005 amendment to Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (making daughters as coparceners) and implementation of Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006 (provisions of mandatory joint titling) are making significant contribution[1]. A 1985 policy directed states to give joint titles to husband and wife in transfer of assets like land and house sites through Government programmes. Of late, prioritized allocation of rights to land distributed under the land grant programs, whether jointly or in the name of women, has begun to reflect an increasing share of land for women, at least in the form of joint ownership of homestead lands[2]. Reduction of stamp duty, for the lands registered in the name of women, has encouraged women’s property ownership rights in some states like Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana and Delhi[3].

In India, almost a third of cultivators are woman, but they own less than 10.34 percent of land, operating 12.8 percent of holdings, as per Agriculture Census, 2010-11, while 75 percent of female workforce, largely marginal or landless, depends on agriculture for survival. The average size of women’s land holding is 0.93 ha, in comparison to 1.18 ha for male and 1.15 ha for all. The regional disparity with regards to women’s land rights was evident with the states in the southern region showing comparatively more number and area of land holdings operated by women while the situation in Northern and Eastern region states are demonstrating a poorer picture. In the last decade (2001-11), number (36.12 percentage) and area (23.45 percentage) of women’s holdings have increased, at a pace, higher than their population growth. (Choudhury and Behera, 2017)

Under Target 5a of SDGs, which addresses the rights of women to economic resources and access to ownership of land, indicators are 1(a) Proportion of total agricultural population with ownership or secure rights over agricultural land, by sex; and 1 (b) share of women among owners or rights-bearers of agricultural land, type of tenure (UNSTAT, 2016) . This monitoring require availability of periodic and reliable gender disaggregated data across administrative layers on ‘agricultural land’ (includes land used for farming, livestock and forestry activities) and ‘agricultural population’ (people living out of farming, livestock and forestry, with land rights or without).

SDG indicator development and tracking has so far been limited to international agencies and country level practical actions are yet to begin. The availability of such potential data sources provides India, a strategic advantage to advance the monitoring around the SDG indicator on women’s land rights. The situation can also be leveraged to monitor and report women land rights indicators at state and sub-state level, providing opportunities for comparative appreciation and competition among land-administration units and departments, leading to better governance.

Participants are asked to respond to the following questions:

How important are women’s land rights and equitable land tenure for combating hunger, nutrition and alleviating poverty and for furthering sustainable development in India?
What is the evidence in India around contributions of gender-equitable land tenure to development indicators around food security, income and education, etc.?
Is there any evidence of negative impacts of gender-inequitable land tenure on agricultural production and food security?
Does gender-equitable tenure matter to Indian women in rural and urban India? What have been their perceptions of tenure security?
What kind of legal and institutional reforms or challenges are expediting or hindering equitable land tenure in India and in its states?
Are there examples of good practices or innovations around women’s equitable land tenure rights, which can be replicated across the country?
What are the specific challenges and bottlenecks for the realization of gender equitable land tenure by 2030? What policy and institutional reforms would be required to create an enabling environment? Whether policy level incentives (viz. lesser stamp duty for women) help enhancing women’s land rights?
What is the present status of women’s land rights in India? How is it reported? Are there administrative or other open datasets that could be used to monitor women’s land rights in India and in its states?
How can India address its commitment towards reporting of SDG indicators related to women’s land rights? How can the country and states progress in reporting and monitoring gender equitable land tenure governance in the context of the SDGs?
Are existing datasets adequate? What kind of data is more appropriate and how it can be collected?
What should be the institutional mechanism for such monitoring? Who should be involved? What should be the level and frequencies of such monitoring? Will it be adequate to just report per SDG or link the information to decision making? What could be the mechanism?
What are the good practices? What kind of policy learning do they provide?
How are gender differences in investment processes, participation and decision making, and benefit sharing being addressed, and to what effect?
How to join the dialogue

The dialogue is open to anyone with an interest in land issues. To make a contribution to the discussion, first register here.

Please feel free to answer as many questions as you like and then upload your contributions to the dialogue. You are welcome to make more than one contribution. Your contributions should be brief –not more than 500 words, and may be shorter. You may also query other participants and comment on their contributions.

If you have any questions on content or if you want to discuss your contribution before the dialogue start, please feel free to contact the dialogue moderator Pranab Choudhury at pranabrc@nrmc.co (link sends e-mail).

If you have question technical question on user interface etc. please contact Neil Sorensen, Land Portal, at neil.sorensen@landportal.info (link sends e-mail)

9-13 April, 2018 – Turin, Italy

How can organizations become gender responsive and transformative? The presence of more women does not automatically mean greater equality. This course analyses success stories and barriers, and goes deeper by looking at gender as part of an organizational change management strategy rather than as a stand-alone item on the agenda.

This workshop will be of particular interest for leaders and managers at all levels in the public sector, aid and UN organizations, private and non-profit sectors as well as gender and HR specialists. Participants will analyze how organizations manage change, particularly when introducing gender equality policies, strategies and actions.

The workshop is led by Sara Falcão Casaca, Professor of Sociology at the School of Economics and Management, University of Lisbon and researcher at the Research Centre in Economic and Organisational Sociology and by Nat Clegg, international coaching, psychologist and global enterprise development.

Application deadline: 9 March

Make sure you register in time to save your seat!

Got any questions? Please don’t hesitate to contact us: ilsgen@itcilo.org
or visit the webpage of the course: http://www.itcilo.org/en/areas-of-expertise/gender-equality-and-diversity/gender-and-organizational-change

I am trying to document the list of laws in India that have a bias against women.
For example, Section 498A of the IPC which is an anti-dowry law. However, this section has an important role to play even the case of adultery. Section 497 can be applied only if a man (who is a husband) has a sexual relationship with a woman married to someone else. In case, a husband has a relationship with an unmarried woman, section 498A can be invoked on only on the grounds of cruelty.

There are some glaring irregularities in the adultery law as per the IPC.

The offender is always the man who sleeps with a married woman. What happens if the married woman does not disclose the fact that she is married? Even in such cases, she cannot be prosecuted. Also, if the woman’s husband sleeps with another unmarried woman, it is not considered to be adultery!

This might be seen as a positive discrimination. However, the wife is treated like a property of the man! While the Supreme Court has acknowledged the fact that the law is discriminatory, the Government has to now act to change the law.

In fact, the Supreme Court of India has flagged the gender disparity that seems to be the fundamental principle on which the law is based on.

The ITCILO is launching a brand new workshop on Pay Equity and Key Equality Conventions from 14 to 18 May, 2018 in Turin.

Register for this workshop and participate in the International Labour Standards Academy

This workshop aims to familiarize stakeholders (staff from governments, parliamentarians, employers/ the private sector, trade unions, civil society and other relevant partners) with pay equity frameworks, job evaluation and a step-by-step programme to promote pay equity with a social dialogue approach.
The workshop is led by Lisa Wong is the senior specialist in the ILO’s Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work Branch in Geneva who conceived the vision for the ILO/UN-Women and /OECD led Equal Pay International Coalition (EPIC), which was launched in New York at the UN General Assembly on 18 September 2017.

Application deadline: 13 April

Make sure you register in time to save your seat!

Got any questions? Please don’t hesitate to contact us: ilsgen@itcilo.org

• Este debate fue modificado hace 4 años, 10 meses por  f.rossetti.